"Phenomenal, incredible, historical" read the headlines of the newspaper Tribune de Genève in Switzerland, the homeland of Roger Federer, following his epic victory against Andy Roddick in the final match of Wimbledon. In all honesty, editors have run out of superlatives to describe Federer's accomplishments long prior to the day after his 15th Slam title. Sunday was, if anything at all, a poetic day to reaffirm what was already known. Before elaborating more on that, let's remember briefly the events of earlier this year.
The same Federer began the year ranked No. 2, which was unfamiliar territory by his standards. Less than a month later, he was in uncontrollable tears following another loss to Rafael Nadal in the finals of Australian Open, uttering the words "God, it's killing me..." The slow death continued in Miami when, in a previously unseen burst of emotion from him during his semifinal match against Novak Djokovic, a frustrated Federer smashed his racket to the ground. It did not get much better in the beginning of clay court season when Federer lost to his countryman Stanislas Wawrinka after a poorly played match in Monte Carlo. That was followed by another semifinal loss to Djokovic in Rome.
Squeezed between all this on-court misery took place two happier moments off-court; Roger and his long-time girlfriend Mirka learned that they were going to be parents, and a few weeks later, they got married in a happy ceremony in Roger's hometown of Basel.
Questions and doubts surfaced everywhere. No longer was it being discussed whether Federer would end up as the best player of all-time or not, but rather, would he be able to recover at all from the most turbulent period in his career and focus back on tennis with marriage and fatherhood so fresh in his mind.
As if touched by magic, everything turned around, beginning with a solid victory in the Madrid Masters Series tournament, including a win over Nadal on clay. Federer played his best tennis of the year in winning his first title, but it was not enough to persuade anybody that he was back. Few would have guessed at the time that he would remain undefeated through Madrid, French Open, and Wimbledon.
Here we are, less than two months later, unable to find fitting words to describe Roger Federer's greatness. But his final victory against Andy Roddick on Sunday was more than a simple victory. The circumstances, the atmosphere, the cast in the Centre Court at SW19 with its new roof, and the records all resulted in a day that will forever remain unforgettable. It was not to prove his status as the greatest player in the Open Era that Federer stepped on the court; unless one is unable to look at history impartially, Federer's status in that category was confirmed a month ago in Paris.
This grass court was the place where it all started for Roger. He beat Pete Sampras on this court in 2001. The latter was there on Sunday, this time as a spectator, watching the former and showing his respect for him and the game. He was there to watch the Swiss break his Slam record of 14 titles. It was also where Roger won his first Slam back in 2003. Equally, this was the same court where he tied Bjorn Borg in 2007, winning his fifth Wimbledon in succession. And just like on that day, Bjorn Borg was also present on Sunday, admiring the current king of grass courts. Sitting next to Bjorn Borg was Rod Laver, just couple of seats to the left of Sampras. Sitting behind them, Ilie Nastase, certainly a legend of a different kind, almost looked like he knew that he should not be in the same row as those three.
As if those present were not enough to make the day remarkably meaningful, the match was the icing on the cake. A determined Roddick, playing his best tennis to date, forced Federer into a long fifth set before the latter could finally lift the trophy. It was a display of formidable serves, powerful forehands, a Roddick forcing Federer to change his tactics, at times out-hitting him from the baseline, obliging the legend to have no choice but to use every variety available to his game (and, yes he has plenty), and to dig into every iota of athletic ability that he has in his possession, in order to finally be able to overcome the much-matured American. The match began under beautiful skies and ended four hours and 15 minutes later, still under the same conditions, as if to mock the new retractable roof that would have come handy in the previous recent finals.
Perhaps one could say that the apogee of the day came several minutes after the trophy presentation. A relaxed Federer was casually chatting with none other than Laver, Borg, and Sampras. The four of them were laughing and exchanging opinions. There is no need to wonder what common language was being used — it was the language of legends. Poetic image to end a poetic day. Congratulations, Roger.
July 7, 2009
Enis Oksan:
…and another poetic article from Mert…
I think Roddick should beat him once in Centre Court before they both retire. Next time they play in that court, I’ll probably root for Andy.
July 7, 2009
Sharon Brown:
Like always a great article! Kent agrees with you Mert, Llie Nastase should not even been in that box with those other legends.
July 7, 2009
alison:
What a wonderful match it was…and your comments are well put.
July 9, 2009
Gokhan Ozkan:
Great article! Poor Roddick, though, I hope one day he’ll taste the victory at SW19.
July 13, 2009
Umit Oraloglu:
Great article Mert.
We can now say that Fed has ticked all the boxes when it comes to breaking all the records (not every single one, however I’m sure you know what I mean), however theres one major accomplishment he hasnt conquered and thats winning the Davis Cup for Switzerland.
Once he achieves this, then I will use the words “greatest of all time”.
Mert, I would love to know your thoughts on this one????
Take care,
Umit
July 13, 2009
Mert Ertunga:
Everyone thanks for the feedback.
Umit, first of all, Federer has to decide to play first round for Switzerland. He has been repeatedly passing on the first round, and then playing in the elimination rounds, enough to keep Switzerland in the World group but not helping them get past the first hurdle.
For example, this year, I feel that if Federer played against USA in Birmingham, Switzerland would have beaten USA, possibly finishing the first day up 2-0, since Wawrinka did beat Blake to put the Swiss up 1-0.
Especially with Wawrinka in the mix, Switzerland would be a legitimate contender. On the other hand, if Switzerland could make it past the first round without Federer, I also believe that he would participate the rest of the way. So either they have to do that, or Federer has to decide to play in the first round before Switzerland can go any further. He is 27, so one or the other needs to happen within the next few years for him to have the Davis Cup in his arsenal.
That being said, I think he has accomplished enough to be called the greatest of all time. The question on the other side of the coin would be “If he never wins Davis Cup, who would you put ahead of him?”. My answer would be “still nobody”. In other words, him winning Davis Cup is, at this point, independant of his greatest of all time status.
Best
Mert E.
August 4, 2009
Gio:
Mert!
such a great article! i was almost in tears..
great job..i do agree federer is the greatest of all time :)
take care
Gio