It was called Placencia, a town on the coast of Belize. The diving nuts would stay there as a base camp before sailing off to wherever the real underwater vistas were located. Otherwise, it was a coastal city with some resorts (Coppola had one there), many ex-pats soaking up sun, and a single road through whatever parts of town weren't knocked over by the occasional hurricane that roared over them.
The road was dotted with local markets, clothing shops, municipal buildings, and a school. What it didn't have were many traces of American commercialization. Sure, there were Coca-Cola signs everywhere, but the nearest McDonald's was probably back at the airport. Unlike other tourist destinations, walking through Placencia didn't feel like walking through an international suburb of New York or Los Angeles. There was something charmingly pristine about it.
And then I saw the basketball court.
Located near the school, it was a long rectangle of dirt with two makeshift backboards and hoops on either end — the sort of D.I.Y. court that flashes by quickly when the NBA does one of its "the whole world loves this game!" self-wanking television ad campaigns. On this day, it was populated with a few local boys, doing their best to dribble on the bumpy terrain. Some wore jeans and a t-shirt, their friend did not.
He was wearing black mesh shorts with a NIKE swoosh, and a red Chicago Bulls road jersey with "Jordan 23" on the back.
No Exxon station, Mountain Dew, Coors Light, FedEx, Ford dealerships, Applebees, Ruby Tuesdays, TGI Fridays, Subways, or The Gap. But there, right in front of me, a Michael Jordan fan.
Sure, it could have been an artifact collected from an American Goodwill pile, delivered to the impoverished region.
Or maybe this kid caught a glimpse of a Bulls game on the satellite dish, or a dunk on a VHS tape that finally found its way to the local video store (a shack that had about 60 movies, all of them dubbed from original copies). Maybe, despite having been about as far removed from NBA action as Jonathan Bender, this kid found a way to fall under Air Jordan's spell.
I relay this tale, dear patient readers, as a prelude to the larger point of this column, which centers around the completely asinine comments of someone named Candy on the SportsFanMagazine.com comment boards. Candy could be a random female sports fan or it could be Frank Deford (I vote for the latter), but identity wouldn't change the utter absurdity of the following comment she/he left on an article about David Beckham:
"Beckham is already bigger worldwide than Woods and M.J., I meant I would not be surprised if he surpasses them here in the U.S.."
The "Woods" is Tiger, and I don't doubt that; soccer is still able to penetrate parts of the world that professional golf does not. My point of contention is, of course, with the notion that David Beckham was, is, or will be bigger than Michael Jordan here or abroad.
Candy's not alone, as I found a few hundred Google hits for Beckham and "bigger than Michael Jordan." This isn't meant to demean soccer or its fans, or to say Beckham isn't a star of a rare magnitude; but claiming he eclipses Jordan's fame is bat-crap, get-the-straightjacket-ready crazy.
English soccer, as well as international soccer, wasn't exactly hurting when Beckham entered the fray. Contrast that with Jordan, whose fame carried the NBA to levels of success previously thought to be unattainable, transforming a popular league into an international juggernaut. Michael sold the networks, broadcast and cable, in a way Magic and Bird did not. The selling of Jordan as a player/product remains one of the singular advancements in sports marketing history; those endorsement deals waiting for Beckham in Los Angeles are there because Michael showed the world that athletes belonged someplace other than beer commercials on your television screen.
Wayne Gretzky — a guy who knows a thing or two about coming to California to sell a marginal American sport — told the L.A. Times recently that Beckham's "got as much charisma as Tiger Woods." I'll take Wayne's word on that, but would love to ask him whether Becks has as much charisma as Jordan did.
Let's not confuse sex appeal with charm; otherwise, Scarlett Johansson would be the new Meg Ryan. Beckham has a body by Zeus and is an appealing, gentlemanly sort. That doesn't mean he could pull off the cinematic classic that is "Space Jam." Or that he'd have the humility that Jordan showed on "Saturday Night Live," cracking himself up in a mirror during a Stuart Smalley sketch. Beckham's English fans will likely claim he has Jordan-esque charisma ... but they're the same people who claim Robbie Williams had charisma, too, and he's about as charming as a stab wound.
Jordan's fame never needed the tabloid crutch that Beckham's has. Every story about his arrival in America is about Posh and Becks. While I'll give him credit for bagging the only Spice Girl I ever considered diddling (the one who could sing was too much of a tomboy, and I think I saw the really sexy one topless before "Wannabe" even charted), this super-couple act means a constant shared spotlight. Jordan never had that problem — not even with Scottie Pippen.
Beckham's first official MLS game is July 31 in Dallas against FC Dallas. It will be met by national media attention, fanaticism by the soccer faithful, and intense curiosity from casual fans. FC Dallas general manager Michael Hitchcock even made the Jordan comparison to the Associated Press recently: "This is the first time, as a league and as a team, we've had the equivalent of a Michael Jordan coming to play."
Why do I get the feeling Michael Jordan has never been called "the equivalent of a David Beckham?"
And right there's your subtle difference between an icon and a legend.
Greg Wyshynski is the Features Editor for SportsFan Magazine in Washington, DC, and the Senior Sports Editor for The Connection Newspapers of Northern Virginia. His book is "Glow Pucks and 10-Cent Beer: The 101 Worst Ideas in Sports History." His columns appear every Saturday on Sports Central. You can e-mail Greg at [email protected].
July 16, 2007
Jeff:
Your paragraph that starts, ‘English soccer, as well as international soccer, wasn’t exactly hurting ’ has nothing to do with the argument. I’ll give up the point that David Beckham is never going to come close to MJ in popularity HERE, but as for internationally, Beckham is much bigger than MJ was. One of the only reasons MJ was an international star was because Nike pushed him so much and the US was the only really large basketball market at the time. Given, if MJ had come up in today’s NBA then it would have been a different argument. There wouldn’t be any question, but it wasn’t possible to be larger than life internationally in a sport that primarily was played and watched here. You can’t use the argument of a kid in Belize wearing an MJ jersey, either. Give Beckham 10 more years, I guarantee his jersey will be on that kid’s back when he steps onto the pitch. While Candy’s idea the Beckham will be bigger than MJ here is asinine, you claiming that Beckham will never be bigger than MJ was internationally is just as ridiculous. He already is. When it comes to the world market Beckham is the legend, and MJ is the icon.
July 17, 2007
Nishan Wilde:
You are mad to think that Beckham is not more popular than Jordan. Soccer is the world’s sport. Just because Jordan is more popular in the US does not mean he is more popular than Beckham internationally. And the fact that one boy, in one town had a Jordan shirt on does not prove anything. Do you even know how many little boys in cities across the world are wearing Beckham shirts as we speak? And now that Beckham has come to America, he probably will surpass Jordan in the United States what with all the coverage ESPN is giving him. The fact that you think a couple of remote instances where you saw Jordan gear in other countries while Beckham fans fill the globe proves anything is beyond me. Let’s remember one thing ok? Soccer is the world’s game. Everyone, and I mean everyone, outside of the US knows who Beckham is. We are talking about a few billion people. Compare that with the measly 275 million in the United States and then think about who is more popular. Furthermore, you say that the English Premier League was not hurting before Beckham. Well, the NBA was not hurting before Jordan. Just ask Magic Johnson and Larry Bird. Seriously your ligic is completely faulty. Beckham is way more popular than Jordan.
July 26, 2007
Amjad Khan:
Nishan i dont agree with your logic.
Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player EVER. speak to basketball fans and they will tell you that nothing is bigger than Michael Jordan.
Coming to Beckham. Beckham is not even in the top100 soccer players ever. There is no comparison. True soccer fans, will not have him as a favourite player. Only fans that are not into soccer and know him think he is great.
True current greats are ZIDANE, RONALDO, RONALDINHO. These players are far ahead of Beckham.
Beckham is just media hype and nothing else.
If you actually go to places where soccer is BIG. you will realise that Beckham is not that BIG. He only seems BIG in places where soccer is not that BIG. ie ASIA.
Go to places like middle-east, africa, south-america, and europe and you will reaslie that Beckham is nowhere close to Zidane and Brazilian Ronaldo in terms of reverence.
Michael Jordan is a revered figure in american sports. Beckham in his OWN COUNTRY, England is not revered, he is just famous. There is a big difference there.
July 26, 2007
Amjad Khan:
When it comes to true fame for a sportsman.
Noone can come close to Muhammad Ali.
Even remote areas in africa people know who he is. True fame is judged on the playing field and not in magazines and hairstyles.
Beckham has not even played in a semi-final of a world cup let alone the final.
In soccer the most famous player ever is a toss-up between Pele and Maradona. Their fame was attained on the soccer pitch.
Michael Jordan falls in this category as well, his fame and popularity is based on what he did on the basketball court.