Hockey Strike? What Strike?

It's difficult to tell which is worse, the total absence of any progress toward ending the NHL's work stoppage or the lack of outrage about it.

No, that's not true. It's much worse that no one -- at least no one south of International Falls -- cares about when, or even if, the 2004-'05 season will begin.

Part of the apathy can be traced to the NFL season hitting high gear and the prospect of a particularly riveting World Series matchup between St. Louis and the newly Un-Cursed Boston Red Sox. We'll miss hockey a lot more come February, when the televised sports options will be ice fishing and the NBA.

Still, the near-total apathy toward the work stoppage is troubling for the NHL and for league officials' hopes of remaining a distant fourth among the top professional sports.

If Gary Bettman is smart -- okay, forget I said that -- he’d walk into the next negotiation session with a large stack of videos and an even larger stack of newspapers.

He would point to the stack of newspapers and say, "These are all the sports pages that don't have one word about the NHL work stoppage. Not one word." Then, he would point to the videos and say, "These are all the sports shows that haven't mentioned the work stoppage, not one time."

Sure, total extinction isn't likely. There still will be a market for the sport, particularly in Canada.

But survival will come at a price, particularly for the players, who have been living at a standard that would indicate that the sport had built upon the popularity hockey enjoyed in the late 1980s.

Back then -- and doesn't it seem like such a long time ago now? -- Wayne Gretzky was marrying a starlet and guest hosting on Saturday Night Live. Mario Lemieux could have, too, if he had wanted to.

That dynamic duo was scoring 60, 70, 80 goals a year, and a handful of players on a level just below that were slotting more than 50. Hockey had never been that popular before, and it hasn't been as popular since.

For any niche sport, the challenge is to grow and advance into the mainstream, because that's where the money is -- for players and management. In 1990, there were two sports, hockey and stock-car racing, looking to take that step.

The former was a niche sport popular north of the Mason-Dixon Line; the latter a niche sport popular in the south. Since hockey and NASCAR began their battle for the hearts and minds of sports fans, one side did everything right, while the other side did everything wrong.

And this modern-day Civil War had a far different outcome than the original.

Both sports' sanctioning bodies looked to build on their fan bases. But NASCAR did it in a genuine way -- by reaching out to fans and creating a more compelling product.

As some examples of the latter, the sport legislates engine and car-body specifications, in order to minimize differences between cars. On tracks where one driver might be able to dominate his opponents, NASCAR required restrictor plates be installed in the cars' engines, ostensibly to cut speeds for safety reasons.

But the restrictor plates also minimize the distance between first place and last place. And, more importantly, between first place and 10th place. So, even though a lot of drivers hate them, the plates have made more compelling entertainment for fans.

NASCAR also marketed its superstars -- such as the late Dale Earnhardt, Junior Earnhardt, and Jeff Gordon -- very well, which gave fans human faces to root for.

The NHL, meanwhile, tried to build in an artificial manner, by expanding into areas where the sport had no tradition and no built-in fan base beyond those who had once lived up north and moved to escape unemployment or the cold. And those fans generally maintained their loyalties to the teams they left behind.

The expansion also created a talent gap, which forced teams to play the game in a dull fashion that makes a World Cup soccer final look high-scoring. And, while expanding in an attempt to expand that base, the NHL pandered to its base when it should have ignored it.

Instead of creating rules to make the game more wide open and mandating that the officials actually enforce them, the league allowed its product to become even more unwatchable.

With the NHL's top stars scoring fewer than 50 goals, the product also is unmarketable, as well hockey fans know that Ilya Kovalchuk's 41 tallies last season would have been the equivalent of about 70 in 1982, but casual observers who remember Gretzky's 92-goal campaign that year are unimpressed.

Yeah, hockey fans on the Canadian prairie who want more hitting than scoring wouldn't be happy if regular season games looked like All-Star Games, with 7-6 and 8-7 scores every night.

But you know what? They'd keep watching, right along with a lot of new fans who enjoy the excitement.

A lot of NASCAR fans don't like the nouveau fans. And a lot of them hate drivers, like tee-totaling Pepsi-drinking, non-smoker Jeff Gordon, who don't conform to Jim Croce's "Rapid Roy the Stock Car Boy" stereotype, who drinks Coke before the race, beer afterward, and has a pack of Marlboros rolled up in the sleeve of his t-shirt.

But they root for the "old school" drivers like Junior Earnhardt and Mark Martin. More importantly, they keep watching.

NASCAR succeeded where the NHL failed. But, thanks to Detroit and the New York Rangers, player salaries have risen to a point that would indicate a much greater level of popularity for the NHL.

The league will survive, but unless things change -- both for management and players -- the next hockey season, whenever that is, might look radically different from the last. There will be fewer teams and the paychecks will be far smaller.

In fact, it might already be too late, guys. We're learning to get along quite nicely without you.

Comments and Conversation

November 7, 2004

chad:

I live in Dallas, well south of the Mason-Dixon line. I am just as upset as anybody up north. i have been a huge fan of hockey after introduced to it by my boys the Stars. I am upset this year because i lived in a city about 6 hours drive from dallas so i didn’t get to see them any the last 2 seasons, but i moved here for work and was excited that finally i would finally have a chance to go see the NHL in its finest play. I haven’t seen it live in 2 years so i was VERY upset when i found out that they were having a strike. Every sport has its bad times when the players disagree from the organizations but i will just have to hope they get over this and have a season next year. until then, i will just have to watch the fort worth brahama’s play. Since obviously the minor leagues will never have this problem.

November 9, 2004

Tony:

I’m from London ontario, I normally watch hockey any chance possible. I have come to terms with the lockout. Something does need to be done. But anyway, the thing that is pissing me off is how the players can just freely go sign with some europe team and continue making money. Now, if my say welding union or the postal service job decided, ok we strike. I would have to picket my ass out in the cold for a minimum amount of hours a week and not just get another job. I want to see mats sundin or jaromir jagr out on that picket line beside a flaming trash can! thats why the talks aren’t happening the players just have other options instead of sticking to their contracts.

November 14, 2004

marcia:

i’m new to being a hockey fan and i’m in arizona.. and i think this strike is pathetic. i might have to move to canada to get my hockey fill.

November 26, 2004

kate:

I do live in canada, kitchener to be exact and i am very close to the kitchener rangers. I am friends with almost all of them. I dont understand why people are saying tehy would have to come to canada to get their fill of hockey because its teh same thing here, there are no HNL teams playing, only OHL and other leagues that people dont even know about. Another thing i would like to add is that it really sucks because a bunch of the rangers are leaving, some this season some next and they ahve no where to go. Its really depressing when u work this hard to get somewhere and tehn find out you wont be able to go further.

December 1, 2004

Nancy:

We are having hockey withdrawls here in northern Michigan!! Bring back our NHL games!! It’s going to be a mighty loooong winter without hockey!!

December 21, 2004

Cliff:

I hope all season ticketholders withdraw their support and then the owners and players will realize the ordinary fan can not go to see a hockey game

February 13, 2005

jon:

I think this is pathetic that the players have gone on strike. Most of the players say they play for the love of the game. Obviously, they dont and tons of people would give anything to get payed to play hockey. Kids have dreams of playing in the NHL and it’s tough to have dreams of playing in it when there isn’t even and NHL.

April 18, 2005

Brianne Sanchez:

I am a huge hockey fan and I think that the players and coaches are making a big mistake. They are actually getting payed to play and coach their favorite game. If everyone had a chance to play for the NHL then there would still be a season.

May 1, 2005

Allan Osborne:

I think they are making a huge, scientifically speaking, very bad decision on canceling the 04-05 season. I think is this because the players and owners won’t agree on anything. i think they’re lunatics and they shouldn’t be an owner, let you know that they won’t agree on something that has benn going on for wat………………. 250 days and counting. I WANT IT TO GO AWAY, PERMANTLY!

July 21, 2005

Daryl:

I think the FANS should go on strike for
Cheaper seats.EVERY BODY TODAY SEEMS TO WANT A BARGAIN WHY NOT US.I’VE BEEN A DEVOTED FAN FOR OVER 30 YEARS AND THEY DON’T HAVE ANYTHING FOR US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NOW I’M GOING ON STRIKE .TOO BAD FOR THEM.
JOIN TOGETHER FANS

STRIKE AGAINST THEM
(NHL&NHLPA)

August 19, 2005

chris garcia:

i think all of his is bogus who wants to fight over hockey n e wayz

August 26, 2005

Brandon:

I just don’t understand what happened to doing it for the game, for the fans. I mean they get paid for doing stuff that they enjoyed playing, I just don’t get why you’d go on strike. I’ve wanted to see an NHL game ever since my first small time hockey game I saw just this year, to my dismay I couldn’t see any. I was told the players were on strike for so long that they cancelled the season even. One game has turned me into an avid fan, I still will watch the game when the NHL returns, but I won’t see the players the same again. And Chris, learn some ingalish before you comment.

October 20, 2005

Tom Blake:

These guys were so bored during the strike, they came up with a 5 minute sitcom about what happens when you let a couple of yahoos sit around all that time without hockey.

I found it on iTunes when I did a search for “Hockey”

The first episode, Zombie Night In Canada is my favourite episode http://www.paulfrench.ca/hockeystrike/alleps.php

February 23, 2006

dalton:

this NHL lock out is all stupid they should jsut get it over with and finish the NHL season and then go from there

Leave a Comment

Featured Site