By Mert Ertunga
Monday, June 24th, 2002
At the age of 45, Martina Navratilova played singles for the first
time since 1994 at the WTA event in Eastbourne, England. Nostalgia was the
topic of the week on the headlines, spearheaded by Navratilova's appearance.
She was "the" story of the tournament, absorbing all the attention that she
constantly seems to crave.
The fact that she actually won a round, before losing a respectable match
to Daniela Hantuchova was irrelevant. Navratilova had the media members
precisely where she wanted them: as accessories to the stage's surroundings.
On the stage, stood Navratilova, spotlights directed towards her. Resistance
was futile!
Of course, did she ever milk it, talking on radio and television about what
an "exception" she is, and that at her age, "you don't see any men still
competing, let alone women."
Before the tournament, following the news of her receiving a wild card to
the grass court event, Navratilova said, "I am very excited!" Then she dropped
the bomb, "It should be a whole lot of fun!"
Forgive me if I have trouble believing that anytime Navratilova steps on
the court it's about "fun." Forgive me if I believe that Navratilova is doing
this, because her ego is not being fed properly on the sidelines, in the
broadcasting booth, or as a color commentator. Forgive me if everything I
observed for the last decade led me to think that Navratilova can't stand
the mere fact that she is not considered "the best ever" by all media
organizations and publications from this side of the earth to Timbuktu.
Yes, I am guilty!
Navratilova was a wonderful player to watch. Her athleticism and drive was
second to none during her playing years. She introduced women's tennis to
off-the-court physical training in order to win on the court. There is absolutely
no doubt that her rivalry with Chris Evert was the single most important
reason for women's tennis getting attention at a time where men's tennis
thrived and occupied most of the spotlight. She is a fixture in the Tennis
Hall of Fame.
And then, there are numerous titles, trophies, and records. She does hold
the record for most singles career titles, most Wimbledon titles, and formed
the greatest doubles team in the history of the game with Pam Shriver,
winning 20 Grand Slam doubles championships.
Then again, this article is not about numbers and records. Nobody could dare
to dispute Navratilova's greatness or accomplishments. Whether or not Navratilova
herself can take those numbers and accomplishments to the bank, and live
happily ever after with the interest, is another issue.
This is about a woman, who at one time back in her playing days, following
a match, threw a fit at the TV studio during an after-match interview because
she was not part of the generic chosen by the broadcasting channel for that
particular tournament. The generic showed a few past champions with light
music being played on the background. Navratilova warned the interviewer
to "make sure they have her included" in the next edition of the generic.
This is about a legendary player who has trouble accepting that she is not
the "only" legend. During her brief stint at HBO as a color commentator for
Wimbledon, Navratilova was often criticized by her peers and players who
claimed that all she did, was sit in the booth and "throw mud" at other great
players, with the exception of Billie Jean King who happened to sit
across from her in that same booth.
It is also common knowledge that she dislikes Steffi Graf who completed
the Grand Slam in 1988, one accomplishment that has escaped Navratilova.
This became crystal clear during the short years of HBO broadcasting Wimbledon,
when she repeatedly mentioned how Steffi always has "phantom" injuries, and
that she uses these injuries to throw her opponents off. Steffi never bothered
to reply to those comments.
However, not everyone stays quiet and polite when faced with Navratilova's
"mud." In the summer 2001, Navratilova fired a bitter attack toward Conchita
Martinez. She openly admitted to Newsweek that losing to Martinez
in the 1994 Wimbledon finals still bothers her deeply. Navratilova went on
to accuse Martinez of "laziness" - claiming that Martinez never again played
that well because, "she did not care," finishing her comments by stating
that, "the girl just took the money and ran".
This time, Navratilova's "target" fired back with a straight shot. Martinez'
response was simple and to the point, "The only person with a problem is
her, maybe she is angry at losing the final. I've done a lot of things in
my career that I'm happy about and proud of. These comments don't hurt me
at all." Take that, Martina!
Navratilova is not likely to be considered "the best ever" in the history
when one observes Margaret Court's and Steffi Graf's resumes. There
is little doubt that this is eating Martina from deep down. It is widely
speculated that she started playing doubles again to break the record for
the oldest player to win a title and to break Billie Jean King's record of
20 doubles titles at Wimbledon.
For now, Navratilova is also playing singles. Don't be surprised if behind
closed doors, her ultimate goal is to win a major again.
You can convince me that Michael Jordan or Mario Lemieux came
back because they loved the games of basketball and hockey. You can convince
me that Ernie Irvan came back because he loved racing. But don't try
to convince me about Navratilova being back for the "love" of the game, or
for "whole lot of fun."
Whether true or not, Jordan, Lemieux, and Irvan had legitimate excuses. Jordan
and Lemieux wanted to help their franchises. Irvan wanted to defeat the demons
of his horrible crash after which, doctors gave him a 10% chance of survival.
What was Navratilova's excuse? She stated that she decided to play singles
again after losing an unspecified bet with her personal trainer. The loser
had to do whatever the winner wished for, and her trainer's wish was for
Navratilova to play singles again.
Come on, Martina. Come clean, and let it go!
Back
to Tennis
Back to
Home